A PILOT
STUDY OF THE BLAKOE ENERGISER RING'S EFFICIENCY IN SECONDARY
IMPOTENCE
Materials and methods
The
study population consisted of thirty males who attended a
psychiatric outpatient clinic complaining of 'secondary' impotence
(previously sexually competent).
At the time of referral the
mean age of the subjects was 35.5 years (S.D. 8.2 years) and
the mean duration of impotence was 5.25 years (S.D. 4.4 years).
25 of the subjects had previously undergone various treatments
including psychotherapy and male hormones, without significant
improvement. At the time of entering the trial none of the
patients had received therapy in the preceding six months.
The trial, an open pilot study, was set up as follows, each
patient acting as his own control:
a. A 'run in' appliance-free period of four weeks (to establish
stable line conditions and data)
b. Four weeks wearing the Blakoe Energiser Ring
c. Four weeks follow-up period
The 3 phases ran consecutively.
At the initial examination each patient was measured, so
that correctly sized rings could be manufactured. The measurements
were made using a graduated paper tape and circumventing the
scrotum, testes, and flaccid penis. This was taken as the
inner diameter of the ring.
At the end of the 'run in' period (four weeks) each patient
was provided with a made-to-measure Energiser Ring. It was
stressed that since the appliance's effect was probably cumulative
it should be worn at all times during wakefulness but, if
for any reason this proved to be uncomfortable, full time
wear could be dispensed with, although its use during coitus
and/or masturbation was mandatory. No other advice or drugs
were offered, and apart from the patient explaining to his
spouse that 'the Ring was aimed to help his sexual performance'
no further information or treatment was provided.
Each subject assessed himself daily using a specially constructed
but simple sexual rating scale. At the end of the 12-week
study period the mass of data was processed to arrive at a
simple 'improved' or 'same or worse' statement for each clinical
parameter. The results for the Energiser Ring were compared
with the 'run in' and follow up period respectively.
Table 1
| Clinical Parameter |
|
Run-in period without
appliance |
4 weeks with the Energising
ring |
Follow-up period |
Strength of erection
during coitus
|
Improved |
4 |
23 |
6 |
| Same/Worse |
26 |
7 |
24 |
Sexual intercourse
|
Improved |
10 |
20 |
12 |
| Same/Worse |
20 |
10 |
18 |
Sexual desire during coitus
|
Improved |
8 |
20 |
11 |
| Same/Worse |
12 |
10 |
19 |
Morning erection on awakening
|
Improved |
7 |
16 |
10 |
| Same/Worse |
23 |
14 |
20 |
Masturbation
|
Improved |
6 |
22 |
11 |
| Same/Worse |
24 |
8 |
12 |
Results and discussion
Thirty patients who agreed to wear the device concluded the
study and generated data for analysis. As can be seen, (Table
1) there was statistically significant improvement
on all but one clinical item (i.e. sexual desire during coitus)
at the end of the Energiser Ring phase, as compared with the
'run in' period. Moreover, by the end of the four week 'follow
up' period (when the Ring was no longer being worn) significant
clinical deterioration towards the pre-trial level had occurred,
suggesting that improvement is specifically related to the
wearing of the device.
There would seem to be three possible underlying mechanisms
for the Ring's efficacy. Firstly, the small spontaneous electric
currents generated between the plates and the moist skin may
have vasotonic effects on the penile blood vessels.
Secondly, the undoubted tourniquet effect of constraining
blood in the corporation of the penis would tend to encourage
stronger and more durable erections.
Thirdly, the Ring may provide an element of additional (frictional)
stimulation for both partners. Some evidence for this proposition
was adduced by talking to both spouses at follow up. In particular,
the majority of wives had found the device rewarding because
it had provided direct mechanical stimulation to the labia
and clitoris. This had done much to maintain their co-operation
throughout the treatment period. Initially, some patients
expressed reticence about wearing the device, but, with increasing
familiarity and experience, this was soon replaced by enthusiasm.
In some cases both male and female spouse found the Ring visually
stimulating, remarking that "... it added something"
to their lovemaking sessions. Although the majority of patients
had agreed to wear the Ring constantly, as the trial progressed
most lapsed into using it only during coitus and/or masturbation.
It can perhaps be hypothesised that, had the subject taken
the trouble to employ the device as instructed, the improvement
experienced would have been even better. An attempt was made
to assess the Energiser Ring against previous treatment methods.
Although this is necessarily retrospective and anecdotal,
the majority felt that it was as good as, or better than,
previous approaches. The consensus was that it made them feel
more confident and secure when wearing it; with most adding
that they would continue to use it. That no side-effects were
reported in the present study is an important advantage, as
treatment with androgenic steroids can cause obstructive jaundice,
and alleged aphrodisiacs, such as Yohimbine and Strychnine
can be seriously toxic (Goodman and Gilman, 1965).
In conclusion, there
seems little doubt that the Blakoe Energiser Ring may be expected
to benefit a proportion of impotent men and is worthy of inclusion
into the armament of therapies for sexual inadequacy.
References
LYDSTON Cited by Hastings,
D.W in And Frigidity. Churchill: London. GOODMAN S.G. and
GILMAN. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York:
McMillan.

|